A Ruined Naomi Watts Reinforces My Belief in Birth Control
Jul 20th, 2007 by Anonymous Realist
I know we sometimes wax nostalgic in this space, but hell, that’s so often what life is about (sadly.)
Well, our hot tips box has been buzzing. We’ve got a hot TomKatPoshLA story developing; stay tuned.
But, for now, we were mortified to receive pictures of the formerly hot and sexy Naomi Watts in our tip box this morning. Why mortified, you might ask? Isn’t she hot? Well, people, she used to be. But it looks like either an errant sperm or a freaking fire hose has placed those days in the past forever.
Here’s the poor ex-hottie waddling out of Whole Foods in Brentwood. Alas, clearly falling victim to that “hey, bucko, I’m eating for TWO” bullshit we hear a bit too often around these parts. Just to encourage all you males out there to be a bit more cautious with your own sperm, here’s what the little darling used to look like, before this unfortunate incident:
So please - all you sperm-producing males out there - think about this. Aren’t there enough humans and bloated, cranky, puffy, ruined hotties out there? Damn.
She used to look sorta smacked out.
I’m sure she’ll be hot again in a few months time. She didn’t gain that much weight after all. It’s just a little bloat and the huge belly, but she’s probably in her last days of pregnancy so I think that’s fine.
She looks pretty good for a pregnant chick. Naomi has always been tiny, she will lose the weight in a hearbeat.
*heartbeat
Wow. That sums up my feelings upon reading this article. I’m willing to place money that it was written by either a woman who’s never had a child, or a man. She’s carrying a new life inside of her, how is that not beautiful? To critique a pregnant woman because she is too large for your preference is the most absurd thing I’ve heard. Get a life.
Yea, have a heart. She just gave birth, after looking ready to burst with her preggers belly! I dont think there should be “hot or not” criticizm allowed in preggers situations. Shes still beautiful and a good actress. Would you rather her have starved herself and harmed her baby while pregnant so that she could bounce right back to a size 00 the week after? All women go through pregnancy differently, and all women usually gain at LEAST 20 pounds because they are nourishing for 2 while the baby is developing.
Diet & exercise is key. I’ve given birth 4 times & am a size 2-4 thanks to eating very lean & jogging (7+miles/day).
U obviously have some serious problems. I have no doubt that you are a repressed pedophile taking his frustrations out on normal sized women and their reproductive cycles.
Get thee to a madhouse before you run wild in a maternity ward with a machete.
So…in the interest of preventing the spawning of future “meat-on-your-bones” types, wouldn’t encouraging Naomi’s pregnant weight gain be a better idea? You know, there have been studies (look it up) that extol the virtue of gaining more baby weight. Seems that the less weight you gain during pregnancy, the more saddlebags-prone the result of your little “errant sperm” will be. Apparently because starving is hard-wired in. So…In that case, it would appear that the question revolves around whether you would rather roast her now for baby weight or later for giving birth to an Angus calf.
so what youre saying is for men not to get any chick knocked up because they might gain a few pounds? honestly what the fuck is going through your sad little anorexic head? do you want women to starve their babies that are growing inside of them? you are like the Hitler of Hollywood. go shove a big pink dildo up your stretched out asshole.