Comments on: A Ruined Naomi Watts Reinforces My Belief in Birth Control

By: anonymouss

anonymouss — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:18:49 +0000

all of your articles are sick, you need a life if you think woman are made for looking ‘hot’.

By: Leah

Leah — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:19:12 +0000

Wow.
Considering your harsh judgment of Naomi Watts being PREGNANT, and previously calling Hayden Panettiere “eternally pudgy,” YOU must be drop-dead HOT. You must be perfectly in shape, wrinkle-less, smooth-skinned and naturally photo-touched. There must be nothing imperfect about you.

Otherwise, it’d be laughable that you’re criticizing the looks of beautiful people like Naomi Watts and Hayden Panettiere.

…

P.S. Your superficiality indicates that it hasn’t ever occurred to you that looks aren’t everything. Oh, and they also go to crap – whether you get pregnant or not.

By: Kristen Stewart’s Falling Star | Unstirred

Kristen Stewart’s Falling Star | Unstirred — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:03:14 +0000

[...] now. Her new pot-smoking pictures gave us the perfect nudge. Sadly, in much the same way our Naomi Watts article told the tale of squandered hotness, so too does [...]

By: anonymous

anonymous — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:47:28 +0000

so what youre saying is for men not to get any chick knocked up because they might gain a few pounds? honestly what the fuck is going through your sad little anorexic head? do you want women to starve their babies that are growing inside of them? you are like the Hitler of Hollywood. go shove a big pink dildo up your stretched out asshole.

By: fluffed

fluffed — Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:39:14 +0000

So…in the interest of preventing the spawning of future “meat-on-your-bones” types, wouldn’t encouraging Naomi’s pregnant weight gain be a better idea? You know, there have been studies (look it up) that extol the virtue of gaining more baby weight. Seems that the less weight you gain during pregnancy, the more saddlebags-prone the result of your little “errant sperm” will be. Apparently because starving is hard-wired in. So…In that case, it would appear that the question revolves around whether you would rather roast her now for baby weight or later for giving birth to an Angus calf.

By: B-rater

B-rater — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:31:11 +0000

U obviously have some serious problems. I have no doubt that you are a repressed pedophile taking his frustrations out on normal sized women and their reproductive cycles.
Get thee to a madhouse before you run wild in a maternity ward with a machete.

By: ImpeachBush

ImpeachBush — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:40:02 +0000

Diet & exercise is key. I’ve given birth 4 times & am a size 2-4 thanks to eating very lean & jogging (7+miles/day).

By: jd

jd — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:54:52 +0000

Yea, have a heart. She just gave birth, after looking ready to burst with her preggers belly! I dont think there should be “hot or not” criticizm allowed in preggers situations. Shes still beautiful and a good actress. Would you rather her have starved herself and harmed her baby while pregnant so that she could bounce right back to a size 00 the week after? All women go through pregnancy differently, and all women usually gain at LEAST 20 pounds because they are nourishing for 2 while the baby is developing.

By: Missy

Missy — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:58:02 +0000

Wow. That sums up my feelings upon reading this article. I’m willing to place money that it was written by either a woman who’s never had a child, or a man. She’s carrying a new life inside of her, how is that not beautiful? To critique a pregnant woman because she is too large for your preference is the most absurd thing I’ve heard. Get a life.

By: beautyqueen18

beautyqueen18 — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:20:20 +0000

*heartbeat